Explain how Hill and Golding present death in I’m the King of the Castle and Lord of the Flies respectively? Essay

pitcher and Golding both utilise the techniques of symbolism, varied settings and visible finale of the character to present expiry. overall I think that Hill generally presents death more than efficaciously than Golding, because she generally provides more learning throughout her novel, which ultimately leads to the death of Kingshaw.Hill and Golding both use the techniques of symbolism dead stating that the inside of its utter was scarlet with the adjective scarlet interesting as it has connotations of death and of blood. I think this explanation of the gloat is in addition a subtle form of prolepsis as the crow is initially portrayed as a normal crow, but as Hill describes the crow further it is evidently a symbol of death, untold like Warings. What is interesting to note about the crow is that it is also describe as having ragged morose wings- the word ragged could symbolise the aftermath of fierceness, much like Kingshaws exposure to violence later on in the no vel and the adjective black is a symbol of death. Another medical prognosis of symbolism regarding the crow is when the crow circles over Kingshaw, symbolically death looms over Kingshaw.This is comparable to the symbolism of death in ennoble of the Flies where The manufacturer of the Flies also symbolises death one example of this is when the Lord of the Flies states were going to have fun- it is a averment, rather than a question, an imperative. The fun that is described refers to evil, ultimately the death of Simon. Another description of the Lord of the Flies describes that is particularly important is when Simon looks at the Lord of the Flies and sees blackness within, a blackness that spread. Perhaps this symbolises not only death, but death spreading throughout the island as other characters argon killed.I feel this description also has signification because both Hill and Golding use colours to symbolise death, the colour black. The authors also differ as Hills descript ions are far more graphical, for example the crow, whereas Golding is far more subtle in his description of The Lord of the Flies. I believe that Hills graphic description is more effective at portraying death, her descriptions are far more declared but some readers whitethorn argue this to be a disadvantage as her symbols are too clichd. I think Golding is not as effective because his descriptions are a little more implicit, and hence loses some of the value that his symbol provides in portraying death.Another way in which Hill shows death is through the use of settings. Warings is described as being in full night with the yew branches overhanging the windows. Hills common gothic description to a modern reader is a clear signal of death, especially the Yew branches which also symbolise death. The moonlight suggests a sense of coldness in Warings, like a dead psyche for example. Warings is also described as dark and damp which emphasises Hills initial description of Warings. Thi s is comparable to Goldings description of the unfri abolishly side of the island- a place of terror. This is an explicit meaning, terror and death are linked.Arguably, go Rock is the heart of the unfriendly side of the island, palace Rock is described as being the end of the island, literally the furthest away from the island once compared to paradise. The word end echoes the end of life- supported by the statement we shant dream to much hear , perhaps Golding implicitly stating that no one dreams in Castle Rock because death is the end of dreams. Once again I feel that Hill has been more made at portraying death. Whilst her terms are clichd, she adds a greater degree of subtlety in her descriptions as sound, for example the moonlight, the implicit means have greater depth to them, unlike Goldings explicit descriptions.Finally Hill also presents death in a physical manner as well as through description, through the death of Kingshaw. When Kingshaw dies, it shows death on a phys ical level, but it may also have a deeper meaning. It was evident from the start of the book, that Kingshaws death loomed, however the death signifies the death of the protagonist and victory for the antagonist.This is arguably the death of innocence. This is comparable to Goldings portrayal of Piggys death, describing Piggys moments before his death he hear it before he saw it- the verb heard suggests once again Piggys death always loomed, rather like Kingshaws. Unlike the death of Kingshaw however, Piggys death signals the death of rational, not innocence. I think that Hill has been more effective at portraying death because her description of Kingshaw creates far more emotion rather than the death of Piggy, Goldings descriptions are too dull.In summary both authors portray death through the use symbolism, settings and physical death. I think that portrayal of death is very effective, especially Hills description. Hill develops her characters throughout her novel, and when Kingsha w dies it is a certain shock to the reader. Because of Goldings lack of development, Piggys death is not as emotional as Kingshaws.